EEG Biofeedback Training for Chronic Pain
Reprint from EEGSpectrum
article
EEG biofeedback has been shown to be very helpful
with chronic pain. Since these results may be somewhat unexpected, they
present perhaps the best challenge to our understanding of the mechanisms of
EEG biofeedback. When we regard pain sensors alongside other sensory systems,
such as vision and hearing, we observe a unique distinguishing characteristic.
In the general case, when human sensory systems are presented with a constant
stimulus there is a gradual decrease in response to that stimulus. The only
known exception to this general rule is the body's pain response to persistent
challenge. In this case, the response is to gradually *increase* sensitivity
to the stimulus, i.e. a lowering of the local pain threshold. Thus pain can
survive even when the original provocation is removed, resulting in chronic
pain. A self-sustaining interaction takes place between the cortex and the
apparent source of the pain, perpetuating the sensation of pain. This
explanation by no means denies the reality of the pain experience.
It simply defines it in terms of a self-reinforcing, self-sustaining activity
involving the brain as well as the "periphery". That is, the brain
defines what is to be perceived as painful.
A striking correlation has been observed between the occurrence of chronic
pain and a history of abuse or trauma in childhood. One study found that such
abuse was present in as many as 85% of cases of chronic pain. Clearly, then,
more than a "purely" physiologically-based phenomenon is at issue.
Why, then, should a technique which appeals strictly to the underlying
physiology be effective? We conjecture that there is a mutual relationship
between the phenomenon of chronic pain and a state of depression. The
physiological state of depression (to which the person may be susceptible due
to the prior abuse) may bring in train disregulation of the pain threshold; or
the causal chain may go the other way: the persistence of chronic pain may
bring about a chronic state of depression, to which the person is particularly
vulnerable. In any case, we observe symptoms characteristic of underarousal.
The EEG training is presumptively effective in remediating the chronic
underarousal condition, effecting a normalization of mood and of the pain
threshold. Effectively, then, the brain has simply recalibrated the pain
threshold. It no longer interprets the incoming stimuli as being sufficient to
constitute "pain".
This view may, however, be an oversimplification. Frequently, persons
undergoing the EEG training for chronic pain will, after a few sessions,
experience vivid recollections of long-suppressed traumatic memories. This
occurs with such regularity that we always encourage persons undergoing the
EEG training for chronic pain to undergo concurrent therapy as well, in order
to deal with what comes up. In the larger view, then, the remediation we
effect may involve dealing comprehensively with the larger, underlying issues
which manifest in chronic pain and in depression.
Undoubtedly both mechanisms play a role during the full course of EEG
training. In case there is any doubt, however, about the specific role and
benefit of EEG training in remediation of chronic pain, it should be said that
the two mechanisms operate on very different time scales. Reports of
alleviation of pain can occur even within the first session; further progress
can be charted from one session to the next. The surfacing of suppressed
memories may not take place until sessions 6-15, and the therapeutic benefit
of adjunctive therapies not until after that. Hence, there is clearly a role
implied for the EEG training.
It is noteworthy that the field of pain management has seen the first truly
comprehensive, multi-disciplinary approach emerge, one in which biofeedback
plays an indispensable role. Up to the present time, the predominant use of
biofeedback has tended to be relaxation training. The implications of our work
with EEG training to remediate chronic pain are that emphasis should perhaps
be placed more on the achievement of regulation and control, rather than
relaxation.